None that have been brought to my attention.
-ron
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> Thanks, Ron!
>
> Are there any remaining concerns about this document that should be resolved
> before I agree to sponsor it for publication (which will include sending it
> for a 4-week IETF LC)?
>
> Margaret
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
>>Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:40 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: [Int-area] draft-bonica-internet-icmp
>>
>>Folks,
>>
>>I have updated draft-bonica-internet-icmp. The new version
>>can be found at the following URL:
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-internet-icmp-01.txt
>>
>>The most significant change is that the "length" field has
>>been moved to avoid a conflict with the "Next-Hop MTU" field
>>that is defined in RFC 1191.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Int-area mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
