Hi Tom,

thanks for the pointer,

Yes, i think that the same conclusion/reccomendation is in the draft, this is indeed reassuring

thanks, marcelo

El 09/06/2006, a las 18:52, Henderson, Thomas R escribió:

Regarding the collision attack possibility, this was discussed last year
on the HIP mailing list, since it similarly pertains to host identifier
tags:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg01277.html

I think your draft reaches similar conclusions.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: marcelo bagnulo braun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:42 AM
To: Internet Area
Subject: [Int-area] Fwd: I-D
ACTION:draft-bagnulo-multiple-hash-cga-00.txt

Hi,

we have submitted the following draft. It is an individual
submission
and since there is not related to a specific wg, perhaps it could be
discussed here.

The goal of the document is to analyze the impact of new collision
attacks in CGAs and to update the CGA spec to support multiple hash
functions.

Comments are welcome


thanks, marcelo



_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to