> > > I'd add that if the wireless nature of MN-to-AR interface is > > point-to-point (not Ethernet) then we do talk about one > prefix valid > > on that point-to-point link, and about one MN per one prefix; in my > > understanding. > > PPP can support bridging and Ethernet bridges can assign > different VLANs per port. > So the scope of the broadcast domain really is orthogonal to > the link type. >
This is certainly true. However, the point of VLANs is still completely different from the point of providing a prefix-per-MN for purposes of mobility management. For instance, the VLAN concept itself will be in conflict with providing NETLMM services on the same network. Vidya _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
