2006/11/22, marcelo bagnulo braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
El 21/11/2006, a las 20:22, Jean-Michel Combes escribió: > >> - CGAs and DHCP. The goal here would be to analyze possible mechanisms >> to allow to assign CGAs using DHCP and to produce a recommendation >> about how this can be done. The actual DHCP extensions are to be >> defined in the DHC wg. > > IKEv2 too: IMHO, it would be useful for IPv6 mobility bootstrapping. > i don't understand what do you mean here... could you expand?
When IKEv2 assigns the HoA to the MN. This one could be CGA based (BTW, this is linked to the Proxy SEND item mentioned in your first email).
>> - Define CGA extensions for including Link Layer information in the >> CGA. Reference: draft-laganier-send-ll-hba-00.txt >> - Define CGA extensions to include a certified MAC address >> - Define CGA extensions to include symmetric keys. Reference: >> draft-narayanan-pba-01.txt >> >> Other items? > > Do you plan to do a revision of the RFC 3971/3972 regarding potential > feedbacks from implementors? > this could be very useful indeed... do you know any comment form implementors that need to be addressed?
No. But when the RFC will advance to Draft Standard, we will need some (at least, interoperability feedbacks). Best regards. JMC.
Regards, marcelo > Best regards. > > JMC. > >> >> comments on the items above? >> >> Regards, marcelo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-area mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >> >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
