> The > > signalling for the flow binding is still included in the BU, > > at least in MIPv6, or are you suggesting that you don't carry > > anything related to flows in the BU, this includes mapping > > between flow id's and CoAs? > > No, I'm not suggesting that. Naturally there needs be to > some sort of a > link, but I'm just questioning the approach that it should > be both the > mapping and the rule in which case changes to rules would > always result > in mobility management signaling.
=> That's fine, so please question the approach. It's best to have clear questions/doubts to progress the discussion. Or feel free to respond to my earlier comments. But it's hard to respond to statements like "A is better than B" without an associated explanation. Hesham > > /Tero > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
