Hi Alex,
Thanks for pointing this out. We put this together in a short time span
and didn't really do a good job with the references. RFC4225 is
definitely important to reference and we'll fix that in the next
revision. 

Thanks,
Vidya 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:41 AM
> To: Narayanan, Vidya
> Cc: Internet Area
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP Mobility Threat Analysis and 
> Security Requirements
> 
> Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
> > All,
> > 
> > In an effort to document a common understanding of the threat model 
> > and security requirements for IP mobility protocols, we 
> have written 
> > draft-vidya-ip-mobility-threats-00 and 
> > draft-vidya-ip-mobility-sec-reqs-00. Reviews and comments 
> are greatly 
> > appreciated.
> 
> Thanks... just  one quick comment, review to come in later 
> (if needed). 
>   Not sure whether it should be said or not, or now or later, etc.
> 
> During MIP6 RO design one Mobile IPv6 Threat document was 
> developped, which didn't last longer than a few meetings, but 
> somehow helped the design of RO with RR.  And then there's at 
> least one document with "rationale for MIP6 RO RR design".
> 
> Then there are various threat analysis documents in various 
> mobility-related WGs.
> 
> Would those be referenced.  Because sec-reqs has no 
> references and mobility-threats lists no security document 
> (other than mobike).
> 
> Or is the intention of the doc to take a completely fresh 
> look on mobility and security and then put up some generic 
> requirements helping any new mobility-related protocol 
> design... not sure...
> 
> Or is the intention to recommend mobility-security people to 
> just use more of IPsec...
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit 
> http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to