Well, with all the respect, I disagree. A single choice is not an option, at least not a fair one.
I've already indicated two possible choices. I you've a third one, ask in the list the interested participants to state their preference in the next 72 hours or so, and then take a decision. Regards, Jordi > De: Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Responder a: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Fecha: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:10:32 +0100 > Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: Internet Area <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Asunto: Re: [Int-area] About today BOF and possible interim meeting > > >> However, this will only be true IF and ONLY IF it is fixed in the next 2-3 >> days, possible giving several choices for dates in May. >> > We are aware of this, and are trying to come up with the details. Early > analysis indicates that there's likely not a lot of room for multiple > choices, given other meetings in that time frame for the operator > community, IAB, etc. We should have something to tell you by > Monday or Tuesday. > > (Please keep talking about this or id-locator separation issues on the > ram list; follow-ups directed there.) > > Jari > ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
