> Some of the terms related to Ethernet should be clarified, I believe.
> The IEEE 802.3 standard does not recognize the terms 'jumbo' or
> 'superjumbo'. These are as you point out of the standard. The max
frame
> size in the original Ethernet standard was 1518. This was slightly
> increased about a decade ago to 1522 when IEEE 802.1 added four bytes
> for VLAN ID. More recently the IEEE 802.3as extended the max size of
the
> Ethernet frame to 2048.

The 1518 would be (14 header + 1500 ULP + 4 trailing CRC).
Focusing only on the ULP, can we say that 1500 bytes is
the nominal MTU of today's Internet, and therefore all
attached devices SHOULD configure a minMRU of 1500? Then,
can we also say that applications that send packets larger
than 1500 bytes (with DF=1) are RECOMMENDED to use RFC4821?
Finally, could we also say that tunnel decapsulators SHOULD
configure a minMRU of 2048 to account for encapsulations
that might extend a 1500 byte ULP out to the IEEE 802.as
maximum frame size?

Asked another way, can all of this be addressed in a brief
BCP that captures something like the above?

Thanks - Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      

> Also, there is no such thing as a 'extra large
> Ethernet header'. The header of an Ethernet frame is of fixed size. It
> is the payload in the Ethernet frame that may be of variable length. 
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matt Mathis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 5:35 PM
> > To: Internet Area
> > Subject: Re: [Int-area] What is a jumbogram, was: Larger MTUs
> > 
> > Jumbo just means larger than standard.  Given that there are 
> > so many standards to choose from... well you get the idea.
> > 
> > To add to the confusion, to IEEE 802.3, jumbo means 1536 (I 
> > think I got the number right).  This is for extra large 
> > Ethernet headers with a 1500 byte payload. They use 
> > "superjumbo" to refer to 9kB, etc.
> > 
> > It is really important that we do not standardize 9k or any 
> > other fixed MTU as the new Internet cell size.  The intent of 
> > 4821 was to permit the Internet to support diverse MTUs at 
> > all scales.  With a couple of additional clicks on Moore's 
> > Law 9k is likely to be deemed too small, but we really don't 
> > want to have to do any part of this over again.
> > 
> > BTW for some background on the wider problem check out 
> > http://www.psc.edu/~mathis/MTU
> > 
> > THanks,
> > --MM--
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Matt Mathis      http://www.psc.edu/~mathis
> > Work:412.268.3319    Home/Cell:412.654.7529
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Evil is defined by mortals who think they know "The Truth" 
> > and use force to apply it to others.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to