Jari,

> Alper has asked for an opportunity for the PANA WG to send a their
> evaluation of PANA's suitability for DSL Forum's requirements. Such an
> evaluation can be sent along as well, but in that case the status of
> that evaluation i.e. ongoing debate will also be indicated.

We are running the evaluation through IETF PANA WG mailing list so that we
can make it an official WG consensus. And that won't happen until the end of
next Tuesday.

Afterwards, we are planning to convey that as IETF PANA WG's assessment to
DSLF.

Meanwhile, could you please include some text in your liaison letter towards
conveying:
- IETF PANA WG was chartered for the problem space including DSLF's
subscriber authentication issue
- PANA protocol specification is approved by IETF for publication as a
Proposed Standard
- IETF PANA WG will be providing its assessment of PANA with respect to DSLF
requirements separately.

Thanks.

Alper





_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to