On ke, 2016-10-12 at 12:16 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The current meaning of whether an object has a GGTT vma is very
> ill-defined (and note we don't check for any partials either), it just
> means that at some point it was in the GGTT but it may not be now. The
> information we really care about here is whether it is taking up
> precious mappable aperture space. This is the obj->fault_mappable flag.
> We have a redundant long form reprinting of this information, so remove
> that in favour of the compact flag.
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

I'm sure I already reviewed this as a part of another patch, but better
as a separate one!

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
Intel-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to