On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:53:10PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latv...@intel.com>
> CC: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> (Possible duplicate, I didn't see this arrive on the mailing list myself)
> To match Chris's intention.
> The test itself will receive fixes later, and another module loading
> test will be added at the end. This change is just for mitigation.

The test itself is fine, and working correctly to explain that the
machine setup is unable to even run the controlled unload test. What we
are missing is the information why the CI machines are unhappy.

Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Intel-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to