Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-08-10 12:13:14)
> Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> > In the initial selftest, we didn't care what the engine->id was, just
> > that it could uniquely identify it. Later though, we started tracking in
> > the fixed size arrays around the drm_i915_private and so we now require
> > it to be appropriate. This becomes an issue when using the standalone
> > harness of running all available tests at module load as we quickly
> > assign an out-of-bounds index to an engine as repeatedly reallocate the
> > mock GEM device (and doesn't show up in igt/drv_selftest as that ran
> > each subtest individually).
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102045
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>

Proof-read my bad grammar and pushed, thanks.
Intel-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to