+Knut, Fengguang

On Fri, 02 Feb 2018, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>       - If clang now builds the kernel "cleanly", yes, I want to take
>         warning fixes in the stable tree.  And even better yet, if you
>         keep working to ensure the tree is "clean", that would be
>         wonderful.

So we can run sparse using 'make C=1' and friends, or other static
analysis tools using 'make CHECK=foo C=1', as long as the passed command
line params work. There was work by Knut to extend this make checker
stuff [1]. Since mixing different HOSTCC's in a single workdir seems
like a bad idea, I wonder how hard it would be to make clang work like
this:

$ make CHECK=clang C=1

Or using Knut's wrapper. Feels like that could increase the use of clang
for static analysis of patches.


BR,
Jani.


[1] 
http://mid.mail-archive.com/cover.5b56d020b8e826a7da33b1823c059acd0c123f8b.1515072782.git-series.knut.omang@oracle.com



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to