Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2018-02-08 11:25:38)
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-02-08 10:51:51)
> > Userspace provides a 64b value for the priority, we need to be careful
> > to preserve the full range before validation to prevent truncation (and
> > letting an illegal value pass).
> > 
> > Reported-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenzi...@intel.com>
> > Fixes: ac14fbd460d0 ("drm/i915/scheduler: Support user-defined priorities")
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenzi...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>

Pushed with a s/int64_t/s64/ to appease checkpatch.
Thanks, I was hoping to get Antonio's new gem_ctx_param checks in first,
oh well.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to