On Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:25:48 +0200, Chris Wilson
<ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2018-04-05 12:54:38)
On 4/5/2018 4:32 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> As different backends may have different park/unpark callbacks, we
> should only ever switch backends (reset_default_submission on wedge
> recovery, or on enabling the guc) while parked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index e148db310ea6..e2880de2fc7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3380,6 +3380,17 @@ bool i915_gem_unset_wedged(struct
drm_i915_private *i915)
> i915_retire_requests(i915);
> GEM_BUG_ON(i915->gt.active_requests);
>
> + /*
> + * Park before disengaging the old submit mechanism as different
> + * backends may have different park/unpack callbacks.
> + *
> + * We are idle; the idle-worker will be queued, but we need to
run
> + * it now. As we already hold the struct mutex, we can get park
> + * the GPU right away, letting the lazy worker see that we are
> + * already active again by the time it acquires the mutex.
> + */
> + i915_gem_park(i915);
I think we should be calling this before gem_unset_wedged in i915_reset.
With GuC, hitting the GEM_BUG_ON(awake) in guc_submission_enable.
Right, we really do need to restore guc submission before restarting. So
how can we fit in something like
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 9650a7b10c5f..95fa30d9aec6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3132,6 +3132,9 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
i915_retire_requests(dev_priv);
+ if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv))
+ (void)intel_guc_submission_enable(guc);
+
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
?
In series [1] I was trying to fix symmetry in calls to uc_init_hw/fini_hw
where we are enabling/disabling GuC submission. In particular, patch [2]
fixes reset path.
So maybe we should try to merge* both series ?
Michal
*) without my patch 6/12 [3]
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41159/
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/214967/
[3] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/214976/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
