By calling in i915_reset only i915_gem_init_hw without previous
i915_gem_fini_hw we introduced asymmetry. Let's fix that.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 854b26c..a0a5af0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -1902,6 +1902,8 @@ void i915_reset(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
                goto error;
        }
 
+       i915_gem_fini_hw(i915);
+
        for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
                ret = intel_gpu_reset(i915, ALL_ENGINES);
                if (ret == 0)
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to