On 4/10/2018 9:16 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Oscar Mateo (2018-04-10 17:12:46)
This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied
(incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal with it later.

v2: Use intel_ prefix for code that deals with the hardware (Chris)
v3: Rebased
   - Rebased
   - New license header
   - Rebased
   - Added some organisational notes to the file (Chris)
v6: Include DOC section in the documentation build (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
I presume this impacts your work. Would you rather have this patch in
place or land your w/a series first? (Assuming all goes well!)

I can do this patch first and I'll rebase the Gen11 WAs series later, no problem (in fact, this refactoring started because it was quite problematic to decide where each Gen11 WA should go).

Thanks for asking!
Intel-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to