Quoting Oscar Mateo (2018-04-10 17:24:42) > > > On 4/10/2018 9:16 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Oscar Mateo (2018-04-10 17:12:46) > >> This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to > >> its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment, > >> we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied > >> (incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal with it later. > >> > >> v2: Use intel_ prefix for code that deals with the hardware (Chris) > >> v3: Rebased > >> v4: > >> - Rebased > >> - New license header > >> v5: > >> - Rebased > >> - Added some organisational notes to the file (Chris) > >> v6: Include DOC section in the documentation build (Jani) > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com> > >> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> > >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > I presume this impacts your work. Would you rather have this patch in > > place or land your w/a series first? (Assuming all goes well!) > > -Chris > > I can do this patch first and I'll rebase the Gen11 WAs series later, no > problem (in fact, this refactoring started because it was quite > problematic to decide where each Gen11 WA should go).
I did a pass to try and make checkpatch happier and pushed. Thanks for the patches, hopefully not causing too much work for you! -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intelfirstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx