On 7/11/18 10:45 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:40:58AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 10:36:40AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> Makes the macros resilient against if {} else {} blocks right
>>> afterwards.
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
>>> Cc: Shaohua Li <s...@fb.com>
>>> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstew...@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph...@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
>> Jens, it'd probably be best to route this through block tree.
> Oops, this requires an earlier patch to move the for_each_if def to a
> common header and should be routed together.

Yeah, this is a problem with the submission.

Always (ALWAYS) CC folks on at least the cover letter and generic
earlier patches. Getting just one patch sent like this is mostly
useless, and causes more harm than good.

Jens Axboe

Intel-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to