As we may park the gt during request retirement, we may then cancel the
retirement worker only to then program the delayed worker once more.

If we schedule the next delayed retirement worker first, if we then park
the gt, the work remain cancelled [until we unpark].

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
index a79e6efb31a2..25291e2af21e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
@@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ static void retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
        struct intel_gt *gt =
                container_of(work, typeof(*gt), requests.retire_work.work);
 
-       intel_gt_retire_requests(gt);
        schedule_delayed_work(&gt->requests.retire_work,
                              round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ));
+       intel_gt_retire_requests(gt);
 }
 
 void intel_gt_init_requests(struct intel_gt *gt)
-- 
2.24.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to