On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:16:27PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 04:57:02PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The adapter->vf_mvs.l list needs to be initialized even if the list is
> > empty. Otherwise it will lead to crashes.
> >
> > Fixes: c6bda30a06d9 ("ixgbe: Reconfigure SR-IOV Init")
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I see that the patch cited above added the line you are changing.
> But it also seems to me that patch was moving it from elsewhere.
>
> Perhaps I am mistaken, but I wonder if this is a better tag.
>
> Fixes: a1cbb15c1397 ("ixgbe: Add macvlan support for VF")
>
Yeah. You're right. I'll resend.
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
> > index a703ba975205..9cfdfa8a4355 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ static inline void ixgbe_alloc_vf_macvlans(struct
> > ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> > struct vf_macvlans *mv_list;
> > int num_vf_macvlans, i;
> >
> > + /* Initialize list of VF macvlans */
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&adapter->vf_mvs.l);
> > +
> > num_vf_macvlans = hw->mac.num_rar_entries -
> > (IXGBE_MAX_PF_MACVLANS + 1 + num_vfs);
> > if (!num_vf_macvlans)
> > @@ -36,8 +39,6 @@ static inline void ixgbe_alloc_vf_macvlans(struct
> > ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> > mv_list = kcalloc(num_vf_macvlans, sizeof(struct vf_macvlans),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (mv_list) {
>
> I'm not sure it it is worth it, but perhaps more conventional error
> handling could be used here:
>
> if (!mv_list)
> return;
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_vf_macvlans; i++) {
> ...
I mean error handling is always cleaner than success handling but it's
probably not worth cleaning up in old code. I say it's not worth
cleaning up old code and yet I secretly reversed two if statements like
this yesterday. :P
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
It really is nicer, yes. But it just makes the patch too noisy.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
