Dne čt 19. 10. 2023 21:24 uživatel Jacob Keller <[email protected]>
napsal:

>
>
> On 10/18/2023 5:30 AM, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> > On 10/18/23 13:26, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> >> Commit c87c938f62d8f1 ("i40e: Add VF VLAN pruning") added new
> >> PF flag I40E_FLAG_VF_VLAN_PRUNING but its value collides with
> >> existing I40E_FLAG_TOTAL_PORT_SHUTDOWN_ENABLED flag.
> >>
> >> Move the affected flag at the end of the flags and fix its value.
> >>
> >> Cc: Mateusz Palczewski <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 2 +-
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> >> index 6e310a53946782..55bb0b5310d5b4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> >> @@ -580,7 +580,6 @@ struct i40e_pf {
> >>   #define I40E_FLAG_DISABLE_FW_LLDP          BIT(24)
> >>   #define I40E_FLAG_RS_FEC                   BIT(25)
> >>   #define I40E_FLAG_BASE_R_FEC                       BIT(26)
> >> -#define I40E_FLAG_VF_VLAN_PRUNING           BIT(27)
> >>   /* TOTAL_PORT_SHUTDOWN
> >>    * Allows to physically disable the link on the NIC's port.
> >>    * If enabled, (after link down request from the OS)
> >> @@ -603,6 +602,7 @@ struct i40e_pf {
> >
> > such mistake happened only because list of flags is dispersed so much :/
>
> Better yet if we didn't hard-code the bits, and instead defined them via
> an enumeration so that its not possible :D These aren't even ABI so
> there's not a backwards compatibility risk either.
>
> Thanks,
> Jake
>

Hi Jake,
I have been preparing another series for iwl-next that covers this
conversion. I will submit it tomorrow or on the weekend.

Ivan

>
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

Reply via email to