> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Simon Horman > Sent: Friday, November 3, 2023 5:57 PM > To: Michal Swiatkowski <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Cao, Yahui <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Kitszel, > Przemyslaw <[email protected]>; Keller, Jacob E > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1] ice: change > vfs.num_msix_per to vf->num_msix > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:20:10PM +0200, Michal Swiatkowski wrote: > > vfs::num_msix_per should be only used as default value for > > vf->num_msix. For other use cases vf->num_msix should be used, as VF > > vf->can > > have different MSI-X amount values. > > > > Fix incorrect register index calculation. vfs::num_msix_per and > > pf->sriov_base_vector shouldn't be used after implementation of > > pf->changing > > MSI-X amount on VFs. Instead vf->first_vector_idx should be used, as > > it is storing value for first irq index. > > > > Fixes: fe1c5ca2fe76 ("ice: implement num_msix field per VF") > > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > Intel-wired-lan mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
