On Wed,  6 Dec 2023 16:36:35 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> -     rxfh.indir_size = dev_indir_size;
> -     rxfh.key_size = dev_key_size;
> +     rxfh.indir_size = rxfh_dev.indir_size;
> +     rxfh.key_size = rxfh_dev.key_size;
>       if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &rxfh, sizeof(rxfh)))
>               return -EFAULT;
>  
> -     if ((user_indir_size && (user_indir_size != dev_indir_size)) ||
> -         (user_key_size && (user_key_size != dev_key_size)))
> +     if ((user_indir_size && user_indir_size != rxfh_dev.indir_size) ||
> +         (user_key_size && user_key_size != rxfh_dev.key_size))
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> -     indir_bytes = user_indir_size * sizeof(indir[0]);
> -     total_size = indir_bytes + user_key_size;
> -     rss_config = kzalloc(total_size, GFP_USER);
> -     if (!rss_config)
> -             return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -     if (user_indir_size)
> -             indir = (u32 *)rss_config;
> +     indir_bytes = user_indir_size * sizeof(*rxfh_dev.indir);
> +     if (indir_bytes) {
> +             rxfh_dev.indir = kzalloc(indir_bytes, GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!rxfh_dev.indir)
> +                     return -ENOMEM;
> +     }
>  
> -     if (user_key_size)
> -             hkey = rss_config + indir_bytes;
> +     if (user_key_size) {
> +             rxfh_dev.key = kzalloc(user_key_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!rxfh_dev.key) {
> +                     kfree(rxfh_dev.indir);
> +                     return -ENOMEM;
> +             }
> +     }

Splitting the allocation into two separate kzalloc()s should be 
a separate change.

> +struct ethtool_rxfh_param {
> +     __u8    hfunc;
> +     __u32   indir_size;
> +     __u32   *indir;
> +     __u32   key_size;
> +     __u8    *key;
> +};

no underscores needed on types, this is a kernel struct
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

Reply via email to