> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Hilber <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 5:15 PM > To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <[email protected]>; Andy Shevchenko > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-wired- > [email protected]; Dong, Eddie <[email protected]>; Hall, Christopher S > <[email protected]>; Brandeburg, Jesse > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]>; N, Pandith > <[email protected]>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa > <[email protected]>; T R, Thejesh Reddy > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator > > On 09.01.24 07:31, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 8:50 PM > >> To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-wired- > >> [email protected]; Dong, Eddie <[email protected]>; Hall, > >> Christopher S <[email protected]>; Brandeburg, Jesse > >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected]; Nguyen, Anthony L > >> <[email protected]>; N, Pandith <[email protected]>; > >> Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa <[email protected]>; > >> T R, Thejesh Reddy <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator > >> > [...] > >> At some point you should announce v1 of the series. RFC is usually > >> being neglected by many (busy) maintainers. > > > > This patch series is dependent on > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231215220612.173603-2- > [email protected]/T/ which is RFC. > > So I understand my dependency series being RFC prevents the PPS series from > dropping the RFC tag (correct me if I am wrong). > > I plan to send out a non-RFC version of the dependency series next. So far I > think > there will only be polishing changes. Due to testing being some effort, I > wanted > to test and send it together with some other series. > > But if this is blocking the PPS series, I think I could send out a non-RFC > version of > the dependency series earlier (by the end of January?). Please let me know > what > would align with the PPS series timeline.
Thanks Peter, This timeline should be okay. We will also send non-RFC v1 by the same time. Regards, Sowjanya > Regards, > > Peter > > > > > Regards, > > Sowjanya > >> > >> -- > >> With Best Regards, > >> Andy Shevchenko > >> > >
