On 2/26/2024 7:11 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > This is a cleanup. It is unnecessary to have this function just to call > another function. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]> Obvious cleanup, thanks! Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]>
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/3] ice: lighter locking... Michal Schmidt
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 1/3] ice: add ice_ad... Michal Schmidt
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 1/3] ice: ad... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 1/3] ice: ad... Jiri Pirko
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 1/3] ice... Michal Schmidt
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 2/3] ice: avoid the ... Michal Schmidt
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 2/3] ice: av... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 2/3] ice... Michal Schmidt
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 2/3]... Jacob Keller
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 3/3] ice: fold ice_p... Michal Schmidt
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 3/3] ice: fo... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/3] ice: lighte... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/3] ice: li... Michal Schmidt
