On 3/14/24 11:35, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2024-03-14 11:21:38 [+0100], Przemek Kitszel wrote:
On 3/13/24 14:03, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
The initial igc Tx timestamping implementation used only one register for
retrieving Tx timestamps. Commit 3ed247e78911 ("igc: Add support for
multiple in-flight TX timestamps") added support for utilizing all four of
them e.g., for multiple domain support. Remove the stale comment/FIXME.
Fixes: 3ed247e78911 ("igc: Add support for multiple in-flight TX timestamps")
I would remove fixes tag (but keep the mention in commit msg).
And I would also target it to iwl-next when the window will open.
Rationale: it's really not a fix.
It is a fix as it removes something that is not accurate. But it only
changes a comment so it has not outcome in the binary. I think what you
mean is that you wish that it will not be backported stable. Still
people reading the code of a v6.6 kernel might get confused.
Sebastian
You are right that this will cause no harm to backport it as is too,
I'm fine with that after a second though, so:
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <[email protected]>