On 7/25/2024 2:34 AM, Karol Kolacinski wrote: > From: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> > > The E830 and E82x devices use essentially the same logic for performing > a crosstimestamp. The only difference is that E830 hardware has > different offsets. Instead of having two implementations, combine them > into a single ice_capture_crosststamp() function. > > Also combine the wrapper functions which call > get_device_system_crosststamp() into a single ice_ptp_getcrosststamp() > function. > The commit message could probably be updated since I think this is referring to E830 code which is only in our internal branch. I guess you must have squashed this together with the original E830 implementation rather than sending that up and then this refactor/cleanup? Not a huge deal, but it is somewhat confusing when reading the actual patch code. Thanks, Jake
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 0/4] ice: Implement... Karol Kolacinski
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 1/4] ice: Impl... Karol Kolacinski
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 1/4] i... Alexander Lobakin
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 3/4] ice: Add ... Karol Kolacinski
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 3/4] i... Alexander Lobakin
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 2/4] ice: Proc... Karol Kolacinski
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 2/4] i... Alexander Lobakin
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 4/4] ice: comb... Karol Kolacinski
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 4/4] i... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 4/4] i... Alexander Lobakin
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 4/... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-next 4/... Kolacinski, Karol
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iwl-nex... Alexander Lobakin
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 iw... Kolacinski, Karol
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v... Alexander Lobakin
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PAT... Jakub Kicinski
