> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> Simon Horman
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 9:16 AM
> To: Lobakin, Aleksander <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linga, Pavan Kumar <[email protected]>; NEX SW NCIS OSDT ITP
> Upstreaming <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>; Kubiak, Michal
> <[email protected]>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>; intel-wired-
> [email protected]; Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>; David S. Miller
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net 2/3] idpf: fix memleak in vport
> interrupt configuration
> 
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 03:40:23PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > From: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
> >
> > The initialization of vport interrupt consists of two functions:
> >  1) idpf_vport_intr_init() where a generic configuration is done
> >  2) idpf_vport_intr_req_irq() where the irq for each q_vector is
> >    requested.
> >
> > The first function used to create a base name for each interrupt using
> > "kasprintf()" call. Unfortunately, although that call allocated memory
> > for a text buffer, that memory was never released.
> >
> > Fix this by removing creating the interrupt base name in 1).
> > Instead, always create a full interrupt name in the function 2), because
> > there is no need to create a base name separately, considering that the
> > function 2) is never called out of idpf_vport_intr_init() context.
> >
> > Fixes: d4d558718266 ("idpf: initialize interrupts and enable vport")
> > Cc: [email protected] # 6.7
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>

Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <[email protected]>

Reply via email to