On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 02:22:54 +0200, Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyway, while browsing through this software implementation of a > verification process, I cannot help but think we'd be making a huge > mistake to allow each driver to reimplement it on its own. We just > recently got stmmac to do something fairly clean, with the help and > great perseverence of Furong Xu (now copied). > > I spent a bit of time extracting stmmac's core logic and putting it in > ethtool. If Furong had such good will so as to regression-test the > attached patch, do you think you could use this as a starting place > instead, and implement some ops and call some library methods, instead > of writing the entire logic yourself? > I am quiet busy these days, especially near the end of the year :) Maybe I can help testing the attached patch when the next time net-next opens. Thanks.
