On 2025/1/3 00:01, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 02/01/2025 11:23, Haifeng Xu wrote:
>> We want to make full use of cpu resources to receive packets. So
>> we enable 63 rx queues. But we found the rate of interrupt growth
>> on cpu 0~15 is faster than other cpus(almost twice).
> ...
>> I am confused that why ixgbe NIC can dispatch the packets
>> to the rx queues that not specified in RSS configuration.
> 
> Hypothesis: it isn't doing so, RX is only happening on cpus (and
>  queues) 0-15, but the other CPUs are still sending traffic and
>  thus getting TX completion interrupts from their TX queues.
> `ethtool -S` output has per-queue traffic stats which should
>  confirm this.
> 

I use ethtool -S to check the rx_queus stats and here is the result.

According to the below stats, all cpus have new packets received.

cpu     t1(bytes)       t2(bytes)       delta(bytes)

0       154155550267550 154156433828875 883561325
1       148748566285840 148749509346247 943060407
2       148874911191685 148875798038140 886846455
3       152483460327704 152484251468998 791141294
4       147790981836915 147791775847804 794010889
5       146047892285722 146048778285682 885999960
6       142880516825921 142881213804363 696978442
7       152016735168735 152017707542774 972374039
8       146019936404393 146020739070311 802665918
9       147448522715540 147449258018186 735302646
10      145865736299432 145866601503106 865203674
11      149548527982122 149549289026453 761044331
12      146848384328236 146849303547769 919219533
13      152942139118542 152942769029253 629910711
14      150884661854828 150885556866976 895012148
15      149222733506734 149223510491115 776984381
16      34150226069524  34150375855113  149785589
17      34115700500819  34115914271025  213770206
18      33906215129998  33906448044501  232914503
19      33983812095357  33983986258546  174163189
20      34156349675011  34156565159083  215484072
21      33574293379024  33574490695725  197316701
22      33438129453422  33438297911151  168457729
23      32967454521585  32967612494711  157973126
24      33507443427266  33507604828468  161401202
25      33413275870121  33413433901940  158031819
26      33852322542796  33852527061150  204518354
27      33131162685385  33131330621474  167936089
28      33407661780251  33407823112381  161332130
29      34256799173845  34256944837757  145663912
30      33814458585183  33814623673528  165088345
31      33848638714862  33848775218038  136503176
32      18683932398308  18684069540891  137142583
33      19454524281229  19454647908293  123627064
34      19717744365436  19717900618222  156252786
35      20295086765202  20295245869666  159104464
36      20501853066588  20502000738936  147672348
37      20954631043374  20954797204375  166161001
38      21102911073326  21103062510369  151437043
39      21376404644179  21376515307288  110663109
40      20935812784743  20935983891491  171106748
41      20721278456831  20721435955715  157498884
42      21268291801465  21268425244578  133443113
43      21661413672829  21661629019091  215346262
44      21696437732484  21696568800049  131067565
45      21027869000890  21028020401214  151400324
46      21707137252644  21707293761990  156509346
47      20655623913790  20655740452889  116539099
48      32692002128477  32692138244468  136115991
49      33548445851486  33548569927672  124076186
50      33197264968787  33197448645817  183677030
51      33379544010500  33379746565576  202555076
52      33503579011721  33503722596159  143584438
53      33145734550468  33145892305819  157755351
54      33422692741858  33422844156764  151414906
55      32750945531107  32751131302251  185771144
56      33404955373530  33405157766253  202392723
57      33701185654471  33701313174725  127520254
58      33014531699810  33014700058409  168358599
59      32948906758429  32949151147605  244389176
60      33470813725985  33470993164755  179438770
61      33803771479735  33803971758441  200278706
62      33509751180818  33509926649969  175469151

Thanks!

> (But Eric is right that if you _want_ RX to use every CPU you
>  should just change the indirection table.)

Reply via email to