On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:53:41 -0500, Faizal Rahim 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> @@ -1258,23 +1236,8 @@ static int stmmac_set_mm(struct net_device *ndev, 
> struct ethtool_mm_cfg *cfg,
>       if (err)
>               return err;
>  
> -     /* Wait for the verification that's currently in progress to finish */
> -     timer_shutdown_sync(&fpe_cfg->verify_timer);
> -
> -     spin_lock_irqsave(&fpe_cfg->lock, flags);
> -
> -     fpe_cfg->verify_enabled = cfg->verify_enabled;
> -     fpe_cfg->pmac_enabled = cfg->pmac_enabled;
> -     fpe_cfg->verify_time = cfg->verify_time;
> -     fpe_cfg->tx_enabled = cfg->tx_enabled;
> -
> -     if (!cfg->verify_enabled)
> -             fpe_cfg->status = ETHTOOL_MM_VERIFY_STATUS_DISABLED;
> -
> +     ethtool_mmsv_set_mm(&priv->fpe_cfg.mmsv, cfg);
>       stmmac_fpe_set_add_frag_size(priv, frag_size);
> -     stmmac_fpe_apply(priv);

Well, I would prefer keeping stmmac_fpe_set_add_frag_size() before
ethtool_mmsv_set_mm(), but not after, the VERIFY process should be
triggered after all the parameters are set.

> -
> -     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fpe_cfg->lock, flags);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }

Reply via email to