Dear Jan, dear Martina,
Thank you for the patch. Am 04.03.25 um 12:08 schrieb Martyna Szapar-Mudlaw:
From: Jan Glaza <[email protected]> The count field in virtchnl_proto_hdrs and virtchnl_filter_action_set should never be negative while still being valid. Changing it from int to u32 ensures proper handling of values in virtchnl messages in driverrs and prevents unintended behavior. In its current signed form, a negative count does not trigger an error in ice driver but instead results in it being treated as 0. This can lead to unexpected outcomes when processing messages. By using u32, any invalid values will correctly trigger -EINVAL, making error detection more robust. Fixes: 1f7ea1cd6a374 ("ice: Enable FDIR Configure for AVF") Reviewed-by: Jedrzej Jagielski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jan Glaza <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martyna Szapar-Mudlaw <[email protected]> --- include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h b/include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h index 4811b9a14604..cf0afa60e4a7 100644 --- a/include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h +++ b/include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ struct virtchnl_proto_hdrs { * 2 - from the second inner layer * .... **/ - int count; /* the proto layers must < VIRTCHNL_MAX_NUM_PROTO_HDRS */ + u32 count; /* the proto layers must < VIRTCHNL_MAX_NUM_PROTO_HDRS */
Why limit the length, and not use unsigned int?
union { struct virtchnl_proto_hdr proto_hdr[VIRTCHNL_MAX_NUM_PROTO_HDRS]; @@ -1395,7 +1395,7 @@ VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(36, virtchnl_filter_action);struct virtchnl_filter_action_set {/* action number must be less then VIRTCHNL_MAX_NUM_ACTIONS */ - int count; + u32 count; struct virtchnl_filter_action actions[VIRTCHNL_MAX_NUM_ACTIONS]; };
Kind regards, Paul
