On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 05:21:23PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Add the missing linking of NAPIs to netdev queues when enabling
> interrupt vectors in order to support NAPI configuration and
> interfaces requiring get_rx_queue()->napi to be set (like XSk
> busy polling).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index 2f221c0abad8..a3f6e8cff7a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -3560,8 +3560,11 @@ void idpf_vport_intr_rel(struct idpf_vport *vport)
>  static void idpf_vport_intr_rel_irq(struct idpf_vport *vport)
>  {
>       struct idpf_adapter *adapter = vport->adapter;
> +     bool unlock;
>       int vector;
>  
> +     unlock = rtnl_trylock();
> +
>       for (vector = 0; vector < vport->num_q_vectors; vector++) {
>               struct idpf_q_vector *q_vector = &vport->q_vectors[vector];
>               int irq_num, vidx;
> @@ -3573,8 +3576,23 @@ static void idpf_vport_intr_rel_irq(struct idpf_vport 
> *vport)
>               vidx = vport->q_vector_idxs[vector];
>               irq_num = adapter->msix_entries[vidx].vector;
>  
> +             for (u32 i = 0; i < q_vector->num_rxq; i++)
> +                     netif_queue_set_napi(vport->netdev,
> +                                          q_vector->rx[i]->idx,
> +                                          NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX,
> +                                          NULL);
> +
> +             for (u32 i = 0; i < q_vector->num_txq; i++)
> +                     netif_queue_set_napi(vport->netdev,
> +                                          q_vector->tx[i]->idx,
> +                                          NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX,
> +                                          NULL);
> +

maybe we could have a wrapper for this?

static void idpf_q_set_napi(struct net_device *netdev,
                            struct idpf_q_vector *q_vector,
                            enum netdev_queue_type q_type,
                            struct napi_struct *napi)
{
        u32 q_cnt = q_type == NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX ? q_vector->num_rxq :
                                                     q_vector->num_txq;
        struct idpf_rx_queue **qs = q_type == NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX ?
                                              q_vector->rx : q_vector->tx;

        for (u32 i = 0; i < q_cnt; i++)
                netif_queue_set_napi(netdev, qs[i]->idx, q_type, napi);
}

idpf_q_set_napi(vport->netdev, q_vector, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, NULL);
idpf_q_set_napi(vport->netdev, q_vector, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, NULL);
...
idpf_q_set_napi(vport->netdev, q_vector, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, &q_vector->napi);
idpf_q_set_napi(vport->netdev, q_vector, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, &q_vector->napi);


up to you if you take it, less lines in the end but i don't have strong
opinion if this should be considered as an improvement or makes code
harder to follow.

>               kfree(free_irq(irq_num, q_vector));
>       }
> +
> +     if (unlock)
> +             rtnl_unlock();
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -3760,6 +3778,18 @@ static int idpf_vport_intr_req_irq(struct idpf_vport 
> *vport)
>                                  "Request_irq failed, error: %d\n", err);
>                       goto free_q_irqs;
>               }
> +
> +             for (u32 i = 0; i < q_vector->num_rxq; i++)
> +                     netif_queue_set_napi(vport->netdev,
> +                                          q_vector->rx[i]->idx,
> +                                          NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX,
> +                                          &q_vector->napi);
> +
> +             for (u32 i = 0; i < q_vector->num_txq; i++)
> +                     netif_queue_set_napi(vport->netdev,
> +                                          q_vector->tx[i]->idx,
> +                                          NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX,
> +                                          &q_vector->napi);
>       }
>  
>       return 0;
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 

Reply via email to