> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> Simon Horman
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 3:59 PM
> To: Zaremba, Larysa <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]>; intel-wired-
> [email protected]; Kitszel, Przemyslaw <[email protected]>;
> Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>; David S. Miller
> <[email protected]>; Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>; Jakub
> Kicinski <[email protected]>; Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Michal Swiatkowski
> <[email protected]>; Pacuszka, MateuszX
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 5/6] ice: support egress 
> drop
> rules on PF
> 
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 09:50:39AM +0100, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> > tc clsact qdisc allows us to add offloaded egress rules with commands
> > such as the following one:
> >
> > tc filter add dev <ifname> egress protocol lldp flower skip_sw action
> > drop
> >
> > Support the egress rule drop action when added to PF, with a few caveats:
> > * in switchdev mode, all PF traffic has to go uplink with an exception for
> >   LLDP that can be delegated to a single VSI at a time
> > * in legacy mode, we cannot delegate LLDP functionality to another VSI, so
> >   such packets from PF should not be blocked.
> >
> > Also, simplify the rule direction logic, it was previously derived
> > from actions, but actually can be inherited from the tc block (and
> > flipped in case of port representors).
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>

Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <[email protected]>


Reply via email to