On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 01:32:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > What would be better in my opinion is to have it something like DEFINE_*() > > type, which will look more naturally in the current kernel codebase > > (as we have tons of DEFINE_FOO(). > > > > DEFINE_AUTO_KFREE_VAR(name, struct foo); > > Still weird. Much better to have the compiler complain about the > obvious use of uninitialized.
That would be ideal! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
