On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:38:40 +0200 Przemek Kitszel wrote: > > We traced the issue to commit 492a044508ad13a490a24c66f311339bf891cb5f > > "ice: Add support for persistent NAPI config". > > thank you for the report and bisection, > this commit is ice's opt-in into using persistent napi_config > > I have checked the code, and there is nothing obvious to inflate memory > consumption in the driver/core in the touched parts. I have not yet > looked into how much memory is eaten by the hash array of now-kept > configs.
+1 also unclear to me how that commit makes any difference. Jaroslav, when you say "traced" what do you mean? CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING ? The napi_config struct is just 24B. The queue struct (we allocate napi_config for each queue) is 320B...
