> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf
> Of Stanislav Fomichev
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 10:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; GR-Linux-NIC-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-wired-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; oss-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 3/3] Revert "bnxt_en: bring
> back rtnl_lock() in the bnxt_open() path"
> 
> This reverts commit 325eb217e41fa14f307c7cc702bd18d0bb38fe84.
> 
> udp_tunnel infra doesn't need RTNL, should be safe to get back to only
> netdev instance lock.
> 
> Cc: Michael Chan <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 36 +++++-----------------
> -
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> index a3dadde65b8d..1da208c36572 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -14055,28 +14055,13 @@ static void bnxt_unlock_sp(struct bnxt *bp)
>       netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
>  }
> 
> -/* Same as bnxt_lock_sp() with additional rtnl_lock */ -static void
> bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(struct bnxt *bp) -{
> -     clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
> -     rtnl_lock();
> -     netdev_lock(bp->dev);
> -}
> -
> -static void bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(struct bnxt *bp) -{
> -     set_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
> -     netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> -     rtnl_unlock();
> -}
> -
>  /* Only called from bnxt_sp_task() */
>  static void bnxt_reset(struct bnxt *bp, bool silent)  {
> -     bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(bp);
> +     bnxt_lock_sp(bp);
>       if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_OPEN, &bp->state))
>               bnxt_reset_task(bp, silent);
> -     bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(bp);
> +     bnxt_unlock_sp(bp);
>  }
> 
>  /* Only called from bnxt_sp_task() */
> @@ -14084,9 +14069,9 @@ static void bnxt_rx_ring_reset(struct bnxt
> *bp)  {
>       int i;
> 
> -     bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(bp);
> +     bnxt_lock_sp(bp);
>       if (!test_bit(BNXT_STATE_OPEN, &bp->state)) {
> -             bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(bp);
> +             bnxt_unlock_sp(bp);
>               return;
>       }
>       /* Disable and flush TPA before resetting the RX ring */ @@ -
> 14125,7 +14110,7 @@ static void bnxt_rx_ring_reset(struct bnxt *bp)
>       }
>       if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_TPA)
>               bnxt_set_tpa(bp, true);
> -     bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(bp);
> +     bnxt_unlock_sp(bp);
>  }
> 
>  static void bnxt_fw_fatal_close(struct bnxt *bp) @@ -15017,17
> +15002,15 @@ static void bnxt_fw_reset_task(struct work_struct *work)
>               bp->fw_reset_state = BNXT_FW_RESET_STATE_OPENING;
>               fallthrough;
>       case BNXT_FW_RESET_STATE_OPENING:
> -             while (!rtnl_trylock()) {
> +             while (!netdev_trylock(bp->dev)) {
>                       bnxt_queue_fw_reset_work(bp, HZ / 10);
>                       return;
>               }
> -             netdev_lock(bp->dev);
>               rc = bnxt_open(bp->dev);
>               if (rc) {
>                       netdev_err(bp->dev, "bnxt_open() failed during FW
> reset\n");
>                       bnxt_fw_reset_abort(bp, rc);
>                       netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> -                     rtnl_unlock();
>                       goto ulp_start;
>               }
> 
> @@ -15047,7 +15030,6 @@ static void bnxt_fw_reset_task(struct
> work_struct *work)
>                       bnxt_dl_health_fw_status_update(bp, true);
>               }
>               netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> -             rtnl_unlock();
>               bnxt_ulp_start(bp, 0);
>               bnxt_reenable_sriov(bp);
>               netdev_lock(bp->dev);
> @@ -15996,7 +15978,7 @@ static int bnxt_queue_start(struct net_device
> *dev, void *qmem, int idx)
>                  rc);
>       napi_enable_locked(&bnapi->napi);
>       bnxt_db_nq_arm(bp, &cpr->cp_db, cpr->cp_raw_cons);
> -     netif_close(dev);
> +     bnxt_reset_task(bp, true);
>       return rc;
>  }
> 
> @@ -16812,7 +16794,6 @@ static int bnxt_resume(struct device *device)
>       struct bnxt *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
>       int rc = 0;
> 
> -     rtnl_lock();
>       netdev_lock(dev);
>       rc = pci_enable_device(bp->pdev);
>       if (rc) {
> @@ -16857,7 +16838,6 @@ static int bnxt_resume(struct device *device)
> 
>  resume_exit:
>       netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> -     rtnl_unlock();
>       bnxt_ulp_start(bp, rc);
>       if (!rc)
>               bnxt_reenable_sriov(bp);
> @@ -17023,7 +17003,6 @@ static void bnxt_io_resume(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
>       int err;
> 
>       netdev_info(bp->dev, "PCI Slot Resume\n");
> -     rtnl_lock();
>       netdev_lock(netdev);
> 
>       err = bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(bp);
> @@ -17041,7 +17020,6 @@ static void bnxt_io_resume(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
>               netif_device_attach(netdev);
> 
>       netdev_unlock(netdev);
> -     rtnl_unlock();
>       bnxt_ulp_start(bp, err);
>       if (!err)
>               bnxt_reenable_sriov(bp);
> --
> 2.49.0

Reply via email to