> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> Michal Swiatkowski
> Sent: 25 April 2025 11:38
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; Lobakin, Aleksander 
> <[email protected]>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw 
> <[email protected]>; Kwapulinski, Piotr 
> <[email protected]>; Loktionov, Aleksandr 
> <[email protected]>; Jagielski, Jedrzej 
> <[email protected]>; Zaremba, Larysa <[email protected]>; 
> Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v3 3/8] i40e: use libie adminq 
> descriptors
>
> Use libie_aq_desc instead of i40e_aq_desc. Do needed changes to allow
clean build.
>
> Get version descriptor is a little less detailed on i40e. To not mess up
with shifting or union inside libie desc use get version descriptor from
i40e.
>
> Move additional caps for i40e to libie.
>
> Fix RCT in declaration that is using libie_aq_desc;
>
> Use libie_aq_raw() wherever it can be used.
>
> The libie aq error is extended, cover it in ice driver just to clean
build. In next patches the libie code for that will be used in each
of intel driver.
>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_adminq.h |  12 +-
> .../net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_adminq_cmd.h | 155 +---
> .../net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_prototype.h  |  16 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h   |   6 +-
> include/linux/net/intel/libie/adminq.h        |  19 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_adminq.c |  68 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_common.c | 754 +++++++++---------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_dcb.c    |  10 +-
> .../net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c    |  46 +-
> .../net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c    |  14 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c   |  31 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_nvm.c    |  16 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c     |   8 +
> 13 files changed, 505 insertions(+), 650 deletions(-)
>

Tested-by: Rinitha S <[email protected]> (A Contingent worker at Intel)

Reply via email to