Remove `int_counter0` and `int_counter1` from struct igbvf_adapter since
they are only incremented in interrupt handlers igbvf_intr_msix_rx() and
igbvf_msix_other(), but never read or used anywhere in the driver.

Note that igbvf_intr_msix_tx() does not have similar counter increments,
suggesting that these were likely overlooked during development.

Eliminate the fields and their unnecessary accesses in interrupt
handlers.

Tested-by: Kohei Enju <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/igbvf.h  | 2 --
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 4 ----
 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/igbvf.h 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/igbvf.h
index ca6e44245a7b..ba9c3fee6da7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/igbvf.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/igbvf.h
@@ -238,8 +238,6 @@ struct igbvf_adapter {
        int int_mode;
        u32 eims_enable_mask;
        u32 eims_other;
-       u32 int_counter0;
-       u32 int_counter1;
 
        u32 eeprom_wol;
        u32 wol;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
index beb01248600f..33104408007a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
@@ -855,8 +855,6 @@ static irqreturn_t igbvf_msix_other(int irq, void *data)
        struct igbvf_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
        struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
 
-       adapter->int_counter1++;
-
        hw->mac.get_link_status = 1;
        if (!test_bit(__IGBVF_DOWN, &adapter->state))
                mod_timer(&adapter->watchdog_timer, jiffies + 1);
@@ -899,8 +897,6 @@ static irqreturn_t igbvf_intr_msix_rx(int irq, void *data)
        struct net_device *netdev = data;
        struct igbvf_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
 
-       adapter->int_counter0++;
-
        /* Write the ITR value calculated at the end of the
         * previous interrupt.
         */
-- 
2.49.0

Reply via email to