On 7/3/2025 9:16 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On 7/2/2025 11:46 PM, Jaroslav Pulchart wrote:
>>> think iperf doesn't do that, which might be part of whats causing this
>>> issue. I'm going to try to see if I can generate such fragmentation to
>>> confirm. Is your MTU kept at the default ethernet size?
>>
>> Our MTU size is set to 9000 everywhere.
>>
> 
> Ok. I am re-trying with MTU 9000 and using some traffic generated by wrk
> now. I do see much larger memory use (~2GB) when using MTU 9000, so that
> tracks with what your system shows. Currently its fluctuating between
> 1.9 and 2G. I'll leave this going for a couple of days while on vacation
> and see if anything pops up.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jake

Good news! After several days of running a wrk and iperf3 workload with
9k MTU, I see a significant increase in the memory usage from the page
allocations:

   7.3G   953314 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c:682 [ice]
func:ice_alloc_mapped_page

~5GB extra.

At least I can reproduce this now. Its unclear how long it took since I
was out on vacation from Wednesday through until now.

I do have a singular hypothesis regarding the way we're currently
tracking the page count, (just based on differences between ice and
i40e). I'm going to attempt to align with i40e and re-run the test.
Hopefully I'll have some more information in a day or two.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to