> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf
> Of Byungchul Park
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 5:07 AM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-
> [email protected]
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through
> netmem_desc instead of page
> 
> To eliminate the use of struct page in page pool, the page pool users
> should use netmem descriptor and APIs instead.
> 
> Make ice driver access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page.
> 
Please add test info: HW/ASIC + PF/VF/SR-IOV, kernel version/branch, exact 
repro steps, before/after results (expected vs. observed).

> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> index 969d4f8f9c02..ae8a4e35cb10 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> @@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static int ice_lbtest_receive_frames(struct
> ice_rx_ring *rx_ring)
>               rx_buf = &rx_ring->rx_fqes[i];
>               page = __netmem_to_page(rx_buf->netmem);
>               received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
> -                            page->pp->p.offset;
> +                            pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;
If rx_buf->netmem is not backed by a page pool (e.g., fallback allocation), pp 
will be NULL and this dereferences NULL.
I think the loopback test runs in a controlled environment, but the code must 
verify pp is valid before dereferencing.
Isn't it?

> 
>               if (ice_lbtest_check_frame(received_buf))
>                       valid_frames++;
> --
> 2.17.1

Reply via email to