On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:58:29 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote: > On 3/14/2026 9:10 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:08:57 +0100 Przemek Kitszel wrote: > >> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <[email protected]> > > > > Process question - even tho you are also a maintainer I only read > > Tony's tags as "please apply directly". LMK if that's right, I'll > > try to remember / make a note.. > > I talked to Przemek about this a little this morning. Since the > Reviewed-by tag is used more prevalently in our process, perhaps an > Acked-by could mean take this directly and the Reviewed-by keeps the > same process of going through IWL. Other thought would be to explicitly > ask/state for it to get taken directly. Open to other ideas as well if > there's something else you'd prefer.
Sounds complicated :S Let me continue ignoring Przemek's tags for the purpose of direct application. I guess it's more about who sends the PRs than who is a maintainer. If you send PRs I naturally never see your review tags, as the patches will eventually come out with your SoB.
