On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 12:52:39 +0200 Przemek Kitszel wrote: > I see no point documenting such minor details in commit message. > > As a whole, this patch trades a real bug - memory overwrite - for > a slightly different order of operations and slightly different > failure point when there is no memory
My concern is that you're backing out of the promise not to turn a fail in kmalloc() during ethtool -L into a broken interface. Fix it right?
