On Sat, Sep 05, 2026 at 07:52:44PM -0400, Yury Norov wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2026 at 07:32:45PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 09:20:36AM -0400, Yury Norov wrote: > > > The function has 3 callers, all except one explicitly require > > > pf != NULL. Add the corresponding check to the remaining caller, > > > and remove it from the ice_pf_state_is_nominal(). It makse the > > > fun function a one-liner. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 3 --- > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 2 +- > > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c > > > index 73996e3022ef..6d5b8acc4764 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c > > > @@ -1705,9 +1705,6 @@ static void ice_vsi_set_rss_flow_fld(struct ice_vsi > > > *vsi) > > > */ > > > bool ice_pf_state_is_nominal(struct ice_pf *pf) > > > { > > > - if (!pf) > > > - return false; > > > - > > > return bitmap_empty(pf->state, ICE_STATE_NOMINAL_CHECK_BITS); > > > } > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c > > > index d88835482d3a..168d85f9477f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c > > > @@ -5521,7 +5521,7 @@ static int ice_suspend(struct device *dev) > > > > > > pf = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > > > > > > - if (!ice_pf_state_is_nominal(pf)) { > > > + if (!pf || !ice_pf_state_is_nominal(pf)) { > > > dev_err(dev, "Device is not ready, no need to suspend it\n"); > > > return -EBUSY; > > > } > > > > Is the new condition necessary in ice_suspend? > > IDK. I'm just trying to stay on the safe side. The > ice_pf_state_is_nominal() was safe against pf == NULL, > so I'm trying to preserve the invariant. > > If it's impossible, I can do: > > if (WARN_ON(!pf) || !ice_pf_state_is_nominal(pf)) > > This would imply unlikely(), and more verbose than an implied > assumption that pf is never uninitialized.
Let's stick with what you've got. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
