On Fri, 9 Oct 2026 09:43:31 -0400 Josef Bacik wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 5:11 PM Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 08 Oct 2026 21:02:47 +0000 Josef Bacik wrote: > > > v1->v2: > > > - New 1/10: skb_drop_empty_frags(). xen-netfront, netxen and qlcnic > > > relied on __pskb_pull_tail() releasing zero-length frags even when > > > there's nothing to pull, which pskb_may_pull() doesn't do (Sashiko). > > > - xen-netfront, netxen, qlcnic: call skb_drop_empty_frags() after > > > pskb_may_pull(). > > > - skb_drop_empty_frags() checked with a boot-time test under KASAN and > > > kmemleak, on cloned and uncloned skbs. > > > > Please keep in mind that we ask people to limit themselves to 15 > > outstanding patches per tree. You have 18 right now. > > (200 active netdev contributors + an LLM) x 20 patches == insanity :/ > > Eesh sorry Jakub, the skbuff BUG_ON() removal series is the more > important one, this series is the followup so I can finish that work. > By outstanding do you mean per-merge window or once I get > notifications for things being merged I'm good to send the next batch?
Sorry for the silence, I've been mostly offline past week and a half :S
