> [Severity: Low] > Does this description match the tree this patch applies to?
It needs to be clear that it is affected by that commit. > - [Medium] igb_tx_csum() still ignores the return value of > skb_checksum_help() (igb_main.c:6170, `default:… out of scope > - [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but > ixgbe_xmit_frame_ring() has the same ordering bug this series fixes in… fixed > - [Medium] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but on the > igb_tx_map() failure path, cleanup_tx_tstamp in igb_xmit_frame_ring()… > - [Medium] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the > cleanup_tx_tstamp path in igb_xmit_frame_ring() calls… out of scope No plans for immediate followups, anyone/everyone feel free.
