I've already contacted him yesterday. This was what I wrote:

Hi there

I have a question for the software, GMABooster.
In your FAQ you write that the default clock on a notebook with a GMA
950 (945GM) is 166 Mhz. When I open GMABooster, it tells me my clock
is already on 250 Mhz.You also write that when you exit the program,
the clock you've set won't change. But if I exit the program, after
setting it to 400 Mhz, and the open it again, it still says 250 Mhz on
the clock. Is this supposed to happen, or am I doing something wrong?

This is the reply:

Hi,

You are the first user to report such a behaviour.
This may be a defect regarding your specific device
Maybe the clock changes, but the number is not updated accordingly.

By the way, could you please specify your device?

I would suggest you to run 3dmark 05 or 06 (only the Feature Tests)
to see is there a boost in Pixel Shaders and Texturing.
If clock has changed to 400 MHz, the boost shall be very clear in
these tests.

On 13 Feb., 11:46, Aradesh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On ASUS Z-series notebooks dont work pickup frequency more than 250
> MHz :(
> But I contact with autor and tell him about this problem
>
> Card is worked wery well, without bugs and crashes.
>
> On my ASUS Z99H 3D Mark 03 show this results:
> 200 MHz: 1124 Markshttp://rapidshare.com/files/197248995/test200-166.zip.html
>
> 250 MHz: 1295 Markshttp://rapidshare.com/files/197251696/test250-200.zip.html
>
> On Feb 13, 5:33 am, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > was about to say the same...
> > its  VERY dangerous to overclock integrated chipsets... specially
> > laptops
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"INTEL 9XX Gaming" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/intel9x-gaming?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to