:p

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:24 PM, fenrir911 <[email protected]> wrote:
> oh your a jak erss, o well...*cough* mind sending it my way via email
> *cough*
>
> On Feb 2, 2:14 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> looks like fenrir911 was denied :p
>>
>> and anyway about this "fix" what was it supposed to do anyway?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:36 PM, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Ok.
>>
>> > I ve recieved an answer about the "fix"
>>
>> > Marco said
>> > ...
>> > "if you want to face that again, go ahead"
>>
>> > -why?
>>
>> > "Is the fix part of Intel software? and will it patch Intel software?"
>>
>> > -Yes
>>
>> > "Then no"
>>
>> > -but its for an existing registerd MD in the agreement
>>
>> > "then u have to pay fines for that one, without knowing if Intel will
>> > let you dod that over an agreement"
>>
>> > .................
>>
>> > so Kid
>> > In other words, no unless you want to pay the fines for that cause now
>> > im not responsable for anything, thats also in the agreement.
>>
>> > and btw there is debt account for you for 2.48 USD from adds of your
>> > blog.
>> > forgot to say that when i came back from Cali
>>
>> > --
>> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>
>> --
>> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>
> --
> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>



-- 
Espionage724 Has A Signature...

-- 
INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to