nah, im not gonna post it again, simply the V1.0 and V1.1 both in x86 and x64 available..... well, the case closed....
im still hold on to ur sayings not long time ago, lol...newer drivers not meant that it will be better than the old ones......most nvidia driver also applies....while the 190.xx forceware driver are newer than the 180.xx, but the 180.xx performs better and less buggy than the 190.xx... it is also applies here, where the XP drivers v1.2 by KinGPin are better than the XP V1.4 drivers, same as the vista 1624 drivers are the best, even there is a newer Vista MD available, the V1.0 are better than the V1.1 in terms of old games processing, there's a handfull of example....every version of driver have their up and down, whether it's a beta or final, both have good and bad....not all the functionality can be fuse together.... well, since the beta drivers are not registered, so there's no point on distributing it anymore, i respect the copyright.....and bro MAD_BEAST.... cheers ^^ On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: > i cleared the drivers section but there wasnt beta drivers, i cleared > the Stock drivers, and old xp versions and old vista versions... thats > all i cleared from there... > > And yes its their choise, but its about organization why keeping old > drivers when you can find faster and stronger new drivers? also the > idea is to make them easier to take the decision, some new users come > and see over 30 drivers and they dont even know what to use... simply > use the lastest > > why using Windows 3.1 if theres Windows 7? harder, better, faster and > > 1. str > > i mean why keeping a bunch of outdated drivers? > > and i didnt eliminated them > > post em again but im not responsable for anything > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
